The research question
How consistently do patients report relief and recovery across separate migraine attacks?
Proposed design
Event-based attack entries plus brief daily checks and an end-of-study questionnaire under an observational protocol.
Illustrative design: 4- to 8-week diary; setup and recruitment are scoped separately.
Data to collect
- Attack onset and symptom burden
- Reported acute and preventive treatment
- Time to reported relief and return to function
- Recurrence, missed activities and treatment satisfaction
Planned outputs
- Attack-level longitudinal data
- Within-person recovery patterns
- Treatment-experience and missing-entry summaries
What we confirm with you
We agree the population, sample size, country, collection tools, analysis plan and budget. Collection starts after the required consent, ethics or other permissions and a signed scope are in place.
- Define headache and migraine events consistently
- Check permissions for any named disability instrument
- Treat diary events as patient reports unless independently confirmed
Clinical records, laboratory results, photographs and device integrations are included only when access, collection quality and permitted use have been verified. Self-reported findings are identified as such.
Research context
These published sources explain the research need or method. They are not RIDLY customers, endorsements or purchase commitments.
- CONFIDENCE prospective migraine study, 2026
This Pfizer-sponsored study used app recruitment and daily reports of attacks, treatment, pain relief and return to function.
Related dataset profiles
For an existing-data inquiry, start with a coverage review.